Scientific Surveys Ltd The Premiere Pipeline Portal
SSL HomeAbout SSLSSL LinksContact UsFeedback SSL Store
 
PipemagPipedirPigsourceWorldpipePipeconferences
Home
Search
Start here, you'll be able to search products by Title, Publication Date, Keywords, or browse by Category.
Continue
Keep items in your cart, continue shopping
Checkout
Click here when you're done buying.
An account is required to use ssl's secure commerce engine
Once created, you may proceed to either modify your account or continue to purchase items.
View Cart
Check the items you've put in your cart for purchase.
Order Status
Find out where your order is.
 

 

     
Qty:  Add to Cart
Title: Longitudinal stress in buried pipelines near bends or end caps
Category:
Downloadable: Yes 
Project No.:
Research Agency:
Catalog No.: 2429s
Date of Publication: 2018-06-01
Price: $25.00 US
Authors: Dr Fan Zhang and Michael Rosenfeld
Abstract: ACCURATE ESTIMATION OF THE LONGITUDINAL STRESS is frequently required for the engineering critical assessment (ECA) of girth welds or the integrity analysis of pipelines including defects with considerable circumferential extension. The stress in a buried pipeline near a bend or an end cap is determined by the combined loads from internal pressure and thrust force, thermal deformation, and the resistance of the surrounding soil. The equations for longitudinal stresses in pipeline design standards are derived for straight pipe segments and cannot be used to estimate the longitudinal stresses near bends or end caps. A numerical approach, such as finite element analysis (FEA), can be used to accurately calculate these stresses on a case-by-case basis but can be expensive for assessment of multiple bends or end caps locations. In this paper, analytical solutions for the longitudinal stresses in a buried pipeline near a bend or an end cap were derived. The solutions were then verified by FEA. A sensitivity analysis was also conducted with the model to explore the influence of the length of the bend or the end cap and the dependence of the stress on the angle of the bend. Two frequently used simplified assumptions were also checked. One is that “the stress reaches its highest value near a 90° bend” and the other is that “the stress near a bend can be conservatively estimated as one half of hoop stress”. The analytical solutions show that the two assumptions may not be valid at locations too close to a bend.
SSL Home Copyright | Privacy Statement