Scientific Surveys Ltd The Premiere Pipeline Portal
SSL HomeAbout SSLSSL LinksContact UsFeedback SSL Store
 
PipemagPipedirPigsourceWorldpipePipeconferences
Home
Search
Start here, you'll be able to search products by Title, Publication Date, Keywords, or browse by Category.
Continue
Keep items in your cart, continue shopping
Checkout
Click here when you're done buying.
An account is required to use ssl's secure commerce engine
Once created, you may proceed to either modify your account or continue to purchase items.
View Cart
Check the items you've put in your cart for purchase.
Order Status
Find out where your order is.
 

 

     
Qty:  Add to Cart
Special! Free shipping on this item!
Title: Fracture propagation in CO2 pipelines
Category: Technical papers from the Journal of Pipeline Engineering
Downloadable: Yes 
Project No.:
Research Agency:
Catalog No.: 2150s
Date of Publication: Dec 1 2008 12:00AM
Price: $25.00 US
Authors: Dr Andrew Cosham and Robert J Eiber
Abstract: THE FOURTH REPORT from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change states that “Warming of the climate system is unequivocal…”. It further states that there is a “very high confidence that the global average net effect of human activities since 1750 has been one of warming.” One of the proposed technologies that may play a role in the transition to a low-carbon economy is carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS). The widespread adoption of CCS will require the transportation of the CO2 from where it is captured to where it is to be stored. Pipelines can be expected to play a significant role in the required transportation infrastructure.

The transportation of CO2 by long-distance transmission pipeline is an established technology; there are examples of CO2 pipelines in USA, Europe, and Africa. The design and operation of a CO2 pipeline is more complicated than a typical hydrocarbon pipeline, because of the highly non-linear thermodynamic properties of CO2 and because it is normally transported in a pipeline as a dense-phase fluid. There are number of issues to be considered. Furthermore, CO2 captured from fossil-fuel power stations may contain different proportions and/or types of impurities from those found in the sources of natural or anthropogenic CO2 transported in existing CO2 pipelines.

Fracture propagation control is one such issue that requires careful consideration in the design of a CO2 pipeline. CO2 pipelines may be more susceptible to long running ductile fractures than hydrocarbon gas pipelines. The need to prevent such propagating fractures imposes either a minimum required toughness (in terms of the Charpy V-notch impact energy) or a requirement for mechanical crack arrestors. Indeed, fracture propagation control has implications for the diameter, wall thickness, and grade of the pipeline, in addition to the Charpy V-notch impact energy of the linepipe steel, because in some situations the requirement for fracture propagation control will dictate the design of a CO2 pipeline.

The issues surrounding fracture propagation control in a CO2 pipeline are illustrated through the means of two simple design examples: a 24-in (609.6-mm) diameter pipeline with a design pressure of 100bar (1450psi), and a 18-in (457.2-mm) diameter pipeline with a design pressure of 180bar (2610psi). It is been shown that fracture propagation control in a CO2 pipeline can be addressed relatively simply. Some care is required because the trends observed in CO2 pipelines are not the same as those in natural gas pipelines, and the required toughness to arrest a ductile fracture may be very sensitive to small changes in the design parameters. Nevertheless, provided that fracture control is considered early in the design, any constraints on the design can be identified and, in principle, resolved without too much difficulty. It is important not to forget that transportation is an implicit, and essential, part of CCS.

References

1. L.Bernstein et al., 2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis report summary for policymakers. An assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 4th Assessment Report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, November.
2. T.Barker et al., 2007. Summary for policy makers, Working Group III contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 4th Assessment Report Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change, IPCC WG III 4AR, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, May.
3. N.Stern, 2007. The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (also HM Treasury, 2006 www.hm-treasury.gov.uk).
4. C.Philibert, 2007. Technology penetration and capital stock turnover: lessons from IEA scenario analysis. International Energy Agency, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2007)4, May.
5. R.Harrabin, 2008. Germany leads ‘clean coal’ pilot, BBC, 3 September. news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7584151.stm.
6. www.vattenfall.com/www/co2_en/co2_en/index.jsp.
7. R.Doctor, A.Palmer, D.Coleman, J.Davison, C.Hendriks, O.Kaarstad, M.Ozaki, and M.Austell, 2005. Chapter 4: Transport of CO2. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, R.Pichs-Madruga, S.Timashev, Eds., Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. M.Mohitpour, H.Golshan, and A.Murray, 2000. Pipeline design and construction: a practical approach. ASME Press, New York.
9. P.N.Seevam, J.M.Race, M.J.Downie, and P.Hopkins, 2008. Transporting the next generation of CO2 for carbon capture and storage: the impact of impurities on supercritical CO2 pipelines. Paper IPC2008-64063, Proc. 7th International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Canada, September 30 - October 03.
10. Anon., 2000. Specification for linepipe. Exploration and Production Department, API Specification 5L, American Petroleum Institute, 42nd Edition.
11. R.J.Eiber, T.A.Bubenik, and W.A.Maxey, 1993. Fracture control technology for natural gas pipelines. Final Report to Linepipe Research Supervisory Committee of the Pipeline Research Committee of the American Gas Association, Project PR-3-9113, NG-18 Report No. 208, Battelle, December.
12. R.J.Eiber and T.A.Bubenik, 1993. Fracture control plan methodology. Paper 8, 8th Symposium on Linepipe Research, Pipeline Research Committee of the American Gas Association, Catalogue No. L51680, Houston, Texas, USA, September.
13. G.Re, V.Pistone, G.Vogt, G.Demofonti, and D.G.Jones, 1993. EPRG Recommendation for crack arrest toughness for high strength linepipe steels. Paper 2, Proc. 8th Symposium on Linepipe Research, American Gas Association, Houston, Texas, 26-29 September 1993, pp. 2-1-2-13 (also 3R International, 34 Jahrgang, Heft 10-11/1995, p. 607-611).
14. G.G.King, 1981. Design of carbon dioxide pipelines. Energy-Sources Technology Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, USA, January 18-22.
15. W.A.Maxey, 1986. Long shear fractures in CO2 lines controlled by regulating saturation, arrest pressures. Oil and Gas Journal, pp 44-46.
16. A.B.Rothwell, 1988. Fracture control in natural gas and CO2 pipelines. Conference on Microalloyed HSLA Steels, ASM International, pp95-108.
17. A.Cosham and R.J.Eiber, 2007. Fracture control in carbon dioxide pipelines. Transmission of CO2, H2, and biogas: exploring new uses for natural gas pipelines conference, organized by Global Pipeline Monthly and Clarion Technical Conferences, Amsterdam, Netherlands, May.
18. A.Cosham and R.J.Eiber, 2008. Fracture control in carbon dioxide pipelines – the effect of impurities. Paper IPC2008-64346, Proc.7th International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Canada, September 30 - October 03.
19. C.B.Farris, 1983. Unusual design factors for supercritical CO2 pipelines. Energy Process, 3, 3, September, pp150-158.
20. M.W.Wadseley and A.B.Rothwell, 1997. Fracture control for pipelines carrying other gases – HVPL, CO2 and others. Paper 9, Proc. International Seminar on Fracture Control in Gas Pipelines, WTIA/APIA/CRC-MWJ Seminar, Sydney, Australia, 3 June.

SSL Home Copyright | Privacy Statement